Boebert Breaks With White House Over Water War

Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., publicly clashed with President Donald Trump after he vetoed a bipartisan water bill, a move she suggested could amount to political payback rather than policy.

The dispute began Tuesday evening when Trump rejected legislation that would have adjusted repayment terms for a long-running water infrastructure project in southeastern Colorado, an area Boebert represents and where thousands of residents rely on aging systems for drinking water.

In a statement shared by journalist Kyle Clarke, Boebert accused the president of blocking a bill that sailed through Congress without resistance.

“President Trump decided to veto a completely non-controversial, bipartisan bill that passed both the House and Senate unanimously. Why? Because nothing says ‘America First’ like denying clean drinking water to 50,000 people in Southeast Colorado many of whom enthusiastically voted for him all three elections,” Boebert said in the statement.

This isn’t over. https://t.co/SxRacLX8fp

— Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) December 31, 2025

Boebert suggested that the veto had less to do with fiscal policy and more to do with lingering tensions between her and the White House.

“I sincerely hope this veto has nothing to do with political retaliation for calling out corruption and demanding accountability Americans deserve leadership that puts people over politics,” she added.

Her comments referenced her earlier break with House leadership and the administration when she voted to force consideration of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Boebert joined Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Nancy Mace of North Carolina, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, and Democrats in the chamber to bring the measure to the floor over objections from leadership.

That maneuver ultimately led to the bill clearing both chambers with minimal opposition, after which Trump signed it into law despite his initial resistance once its consideration was unlocked.

The water veto, however, prompted a notably sharper tone from Boebert, who has frequently aligned herself with Trump on broader policy fights.

“I must have missed the rally where he stood in Colorado and promised to personally derail critical water infrastructure projects. My bad, I thought the campaign was about lowering costs and cutting red tape,” she said.

She followed by warning that blocking projects aimed at rural communities could become a defining mark of the administration.

“But hey, if this administration wants to make its legacy blocking water projects that deliver water to rural Americans; that’s on them,” Boebert added.

Lock Them Up! Russiagate is reigniting…

Obama, Clinton, Comey, and Brennan are all on the hook!

CLICK HERE to demand Russiagate conspirators got to prison!

Colorado’s Democratic senators also seized on the veto to hammer Trump, aligning themselves with Boebert’s criticism despite deep partisan divides.

“Nothing says ‘Make America Great Again’ like denying 50,000 rural Coloradans access to clean, affordable drinking water. President Trump’s first veto of his second term blocks a bipartisan bill that both the House and Senate passed unanimously, costs taxpayers nothing, and delivers safe, reliable water to rural communities that overwhelmingly supported him,” Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper wrote in a joint statement.

They framed the decision as a betrayal of long-standing commitments made to southern Colorado residents.

“Trump’s attacks on Southern Colorado are politics at its worst — putting personal and political grievances ahead of Americans. Southeastern Coloradans were promised the completion of the Arkansas Valley Conduit more than 60 years ago,” the senators added.

The legislation at the center of the controversy, known as the Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act, sought to modify repayment requirements tied to the construction of a pipeline delivering water from the Pueblo Reservoir.

Under the proposal, interest payments required by the Bureau of Reclamation would have been eliminated, and the repayment window would have been stretched to 100 years.

Supporters of the measure argued that the changes were necessary to keep costs manageable for small, rural communities already facing economic strain.

As Boebert noted, the bill encountered no objections when it passed the House earlier this year, clearing the chamber via a unanimous voice vote in July before doing the same in the Senate.

The White House, however, defended Trump’s veto by arguing that the legislation would have shifted an unfair share of costs onto federal taxpayers.

In a statement explaining the decision, the administration said the bill would require Washington to absorb additional expenses for what it characterized as a state and local project initially approved under prior administrations.

According to the White House, the pipeline project traces back to the Omnibus Public Land Management Act signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2009.

“More than $249 million has already been spent on the [pipeline] and total costs are estimated to be $1.3 billion,” the administration wrote.

“H.R. 131 would continue the failed policies of the past by forcing Federal taxpayers to bear even more of the massive costs of a local water project — a local water project that, as initially conceived, was supposed to be paid for by the localities using it,” the statement continued.

The water dispute unfolded alongside escalating tensions between Trump and Colorado’s Democratic leadership, particularly Gov. Jared Polis.

Polis criticized the administration over separate funding denials tied to disaster aid and urged Trump to reconsider.

“Coloradans impacted by the Elk and Lee fires and the flooding in Southwestern Colorado deserve better than the political games President Trump is playing,” Polis said in a statement.

“I call on the President’s better angels, and urge him to reconsider these requests. This is about the Coloradans who need this support, and we won’t stop fighting for them to get what they deserve. Colorado will be appealing this decision,” the governor added.

Trump responded forcefully on Wednesday, directing his anger toward Polis over the incarceration of former county election clerk Tina Peters.

“God Bless Tina Peters, who is now, for two years out of nine, sitting in a Colorado Maximum Security Prison, at the age of 73, and sick, for the ‘crime’ of trying to stop the massive voter fraud that goes on in her State (where people are leaving in record numbers!),” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Peters was convicted on state charges connected to illegally tampering with voting equipment related to the 2020 election and later sentenced to nine years in prison.

Trump escalated his rhetoric by referring to Polis as “the Scumbag Governor,” adding that he wished “only the worst.”

“May they rot in Hell. FREE TINA PETTERS!” he wrote.

In a separate post, Trump also claimed Colorado and California were the “TOP OUTBOUND STATES IN 2025,” citing population losses.

“That’s what bad governors do to even places blessed with beautiful surrounds and climate,” he wrote.

Last week, Peters petitioned a Colorado appeals court to accept a presidential pardon issued by Trump, arguing that the pardon stripped the court of jurisdiction over her case. Presidents, however, do not have authority to overturn state convictions.

The administration also sought to transfer Peters from state to federal custody, a request that was denied by the Colorado Department of Corrections.

“I hope the President’s resolution this year is to spend less time online talking about me and more on making America more affordable by stopping his disastrous tariffs and fixing rising health care costs,” Polis commented in a statement on Wednesday.

“Finally, I wish all Americans, including the President and all the wonderful people across the political spectrum, a happy, healthy and productive New Year.”